2560 x 1440 (AMD RX570 4GB) gives me a difference of 17% in some important Tasks! It is also worth noting that the 5800X and 5900X outperformed the 10900K not only in the passive tasks but the active ones as well, which was where Intel was previously maintaining a slight edge. We've tried to work with the devs to add the functionality we need, but it can be hard to find time to add features that help us when they are busy tackling bugs and adding features that are useful for their end users. It will probably end up being a pretty big project since we are going to have to take into account how many displays are being used as well as the resolution for each display (since that apparently is a big factor for Lightroom GPU performance). Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Over the last few years, AMD has been making great strides with their Ryzen and Threadripper processors, often matching - or beating - the performance from similarly priced Intel options. PC spec, X470 Aorus latest bios. We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. 8.4)Overall Score: 1000Active Tasks Score: 100Passive Tasks Score: 100, I dont understand why if everything is normalized to 9900K, why the score for 9900K is not 1000 (100 active / 100 passive), Yeah, compare is really interesting.. It is looking like a pretty massive programming project to not only allow people to upload, but sort, search, compare, etc., but that is something we are really excited about doing. How is the performance? You are of course free to do whatever you want with your own system, but we've always taken the stance that reliability is more important than getting a bit more performance since in a production environment, system crashes and lost work costs far more money than losing a few percent performance. The average of 87.7 and 96.5 is 92.1, which x10 is 921. The "Passive Score" does a pretty good job of summarizing performance for tasks like that as well. I used to run this task, go out for lunch, return home and listen to music for a few hours before it finished. If you are interested in how these processors compare in other applications, we also have other articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, and several other applications available on our article listing page. But 9960x is suddenly much worse with smart previews in comparison to your October-Benchmark. So in general, it should be better overall to leave SMT on currently. Definitely enough to skew results, which is why our own internal testing with locked down configurations is always going to be more reliable than publicly uploaded results. That is definitely something I want to look at! And hold that thought on the upload thing - that is a project we are hoping to get to next year. Benchmark Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs Intel 10th Gen. Are the AMD Ryzen 5000-series or Intel Core 10th Gen better for Lightroom Classic? Right now our plate is pretty full, but that is pretty close to the top of my to-do list. The devs have also been putting a ton of work into improving many aspects of LrC that we haven't figured out a good way to test like brush/slider lag and things like that. The Quadro line is mostly about having high amounts of VRAM which almost never a problem for photography applications. These results are then combined into an overall score to give you a general idea of how that specific configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. 2) Should I expect my PC to continue to lock up with either of these CPU’s? :-), - There are no information about Screenresolution- There are no information about RAM CL-Timings. Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. In other reviews, however, there are indications that the 3950x could do significantly better than the 3900x with SMT-off. This limits the Ryzen platform to 64GB of RAM while the other platforms had 128GB, but since our Lightroom Classic benchmark never needs more than 32GB of RAM to run, this does not affect performance at all. That seems huge considering we only see 5-15% gains between CPU generations. Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series. From what your headaches are, the Threadripper 3960X is probably the way to go. 4-core CPUs are becoming hard to find (but not yet impossible), and I would certainly like to upgrade my computer to take advantage of the i9 or Ryzen power in all my … I think above a small GPU upgrade, you are going to be bottlenecked by your CPU. Is this due to another "performance optimization" of Adobe? One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. Even with all the improvements Adobe has done in the last couple of Lightroom versions to take advantage of the GPU, it is still primarily a CPU-driven application. Puget Systems Lightroom and Photoshop Benchmarks Before we tell photographers if AMD or Intel runs Lightroom and Photoshop better, it is important to know why it is Matt Bach from Puget Systems is so qualified to speak to the topic. Also, waiting for the LR benchmark. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the next step up from the Ryzen 5 3600X in terms of performance and price. The reason we use a 2080Ti in our CPU-based testing is simply to make sure that the GPU is not a bottleneck. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. System Specs ----- Asus Pro X370 Prime (Bios 0515) Ryzen 1700x @ … For comparison, both the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core and Intel Core i9 9900K 8 Core have a MSRP of $499. When using nvidia FPS counter my rysen system peaks to 3-4fps while my intel system goes up to 20-30fps while regulating the sliders. Comparing applications is something we don't really try to do since there is so much more to why you would use one application over another than straight performance. Thanks for the info on Lightroom's inability to use SMT. I NEVER delete anything. It may only be about 5% faster overall than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, but that still makes it solidly the fastest CPU we have ever tested for Lightroom Classic. And since the August update it finally - 10627947 Ah, got you, sorry I misunderstood! HP Z440, 6-core Xeon, 64GB ECC RAM, Quadro K1200 4GB, five SSDs (dedicated Samsung 2TB 860 EVO on the PCIe bus for the library/catalog and 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO for the Preview Cache), two 4K monitors but Lightroom full screen on just one monitor. In Photoshop is “opening a file” or “filter results” for me very important, and on and on... Lightroom is sooo good and simultaneously sooo bad :-) I love and edit my files sometimes in Capture One too, but I found Lightroom for my organisational tasks a little bit better. There is almost no reason to use the X-series when the Core i9 10900K is both less expensive and faster, so the true performance lead with the AMD Ryzen 5000-series peaks out closer to only 20%. A few notes on the hardware and software used for our testing: First, we have decided to standardize on DDR4-2933 memory for the Ryzen platform. Yet, if i take a look on the scores of the 9900k it's 921 (87.7 active + 96.5 passive). I am stoked for the release of the Ryzen 5000 chips. I also know Puget Systems recommendations for RAM frequency but in the real world there are many out there with 3600 Mhz or more, see Puget systems database results :-) My working settings are moderate CL 16-18-18-38 2933 Mhz. If you take results seriously, you must search for your workflow results in details. Now, AMD is launching one more 3rd generation Ryzen CPU - the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Organize Lightroom Catalogs. With this motherboard, Thunderbolt support is no longer as much of a factor when choosing between Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen CPUs in our workstations. Frequency can be grabbed through WMI or through the command line, but timings would need an external application which we have tried to avoid doing since it makes cross-platform support much harder. Not only it's probably more important and has bigger impact on the workflow than the export, but one usually exports less images than import and the work is already done. Both missing informations are very important for the endresult. At least today we have the option to get twice the performance for twice the money. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Big THX again for your invested time, very kind of you. Maybe in the future we will try to figure out reliable ways to check for all those things, but for now we are more concerned about making the benchmarks reliable and that they are testing everything we want. It is definitely one of the more "finicky" of our benchmarks (none of these apps are made for benchmarking, so we have to do some "creative" things to get them to work). Takt und IPC zählen. I don't think that is because any of them are scared, but rather because it is much harder to place a value on workflow optimizations than it is for things like "how long does this effect take to apply?". So my questions are: 1) given everything I’ve told you, which should I go with? To get up to the same performance as a RTX 2080 Ti, you are going to need a Quadro RTX 6000, and even then it will likely be slightly slower. All of those can affect performance, and it looks like we have overall seen a performance drop of about 8% with the 9900K since that time. Hence the attraction of a single slot card. Benchmark. When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. At the first look it seems like there can't be more than 5% but :-): RAMDual rank -> Single rank2 DIMM -> 4 DIMMDaisy Chain -> T-Topology2666 Mhz -> 3600Mhz -> 4400 MhzCL 19-19-19-19 -> CL-14-15-15AMD -> INTEL, Resolution1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 -> 3840 x 2160. Not sure there is anything meaningfully faster that will go into the current CPU socket. I notice that you perform the Lightroom benchmarks with 3200Mhz CL22 memory. (assuming that the 10700k in these results is on par with that old 9900k). For the Crowd - The overall result of active and passive tasks are indicators. Overall, the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs from AMD are terrific for Lightroom Classic. High praise & recommendation for the current generation Ryzen CPUs. As for the future, only the developers could tell you.4) No way to really know. Iknow, i know, it's a little bit malicious :-). Between a Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2080 Ti, however, you likely won't notice much of a difference. We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. We used to test 1:1 preview generation, but it wasn't something supported by the API so we had to drop it when we made the benchmark available for public download. AMD has said before that Threadripper wouldn't change socket, then they changes to TRX40 with the latest CPUs. Thanks for the read! On my system, for the Develop sliders (the only performance characteristic I care about as I spend 90+% of my Lightroom time dragging sliders), V9.1 was a slowdown and 9.2 a huge slowdown. Is the correct interpretation then that Lightroom has become ~13% slower between versions 8.4 and 10.0 in the 'active' test? One of the reasons we sometimes used the Intel 10th Gen CPUs over Ryzen when the performance was similar was because only Intel platforms had passed our qualification process for Thunderbolt. Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. If your workflow includes other software packages, you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. i understood how you calculate the total score (Active + Passive)/2*10 .. So, it is possible the work they are doing there is negatively affecting the tasks we can test, but LrC is still way better overall for the end users. Lightroom is my bottleneck- its soslow its annoying. Is anyone out there using Lightroom with i9 or Ryzen CPUs? I'm currently speccing up a new desktop build to mostly run Lightroom and Photoshop, and have read elsewhere that there are good gains in memory performance by using 3600Mhz ram with CL16 or CL18 timing. Ryzen system is approximately 2x> less responsive. In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application. Most important, however, is the performance leap in editing. With the launch of AMD's new Ryzen 5000-series processors, however, it is very likely that AMD will be able to take a very solid lead over Intel in Lightroom Classic no matter what task you are looking at. With that being said, this is going to be a new build for me, and I plan on using it for gaming + my wife will be using it for photo editing (lightroom and some basic photoshop.) Kleines Nordseeküstenschiff Kreuzworträtsel, Hagar Und Ismael In Der Wüste, May Tischtennis Einloggen, Groß- Und Kleinschreibung Diktat, Brombeeren Ohne Stacheln, Gute Zahnärzte In Der Nähe, Something That Might Happen Or Become True Synonym, "/> lightroom benchmark ryzen
Soluciones Informáticas

Prestaciones de servicios informáticos de alta calidad y de soluciones integrales para nuestros clientes corporativos mediante el uso de las más modernas tecnologías disponibles en el mercado.

Medios de Contacto
Arturo Pratt #815
mmardones@softnix.cl
+56 9 8683 0909

Softnix

lightroom benchmark ryzen

Close. I'm sure the hardware itself has an impact as well. It does seem that Lightroom Classic in particular is memory speed sensitive and could benefit from faster RAM. We don't re-use results from previous testing (or do so very rarely and clearly mark them), and since performance changes over time, that means that the 9900K will pretty much never hit exactly the same scores that it did on that specific day. are often not what people are the most concerned about. Why? Display resolution I don't have an article to back it up (yet), but from what I've seen the difference is at most 5-10%. One of the first things is to get our Lightroom Classic benchmark up for public download. You say that the score of 1000 is made by the average of Passive Score + Active score of a system who is based on the Intel 9900K. it is very hard to know where you stand with performance on your current system. I have BIG catalogs- 30K to 100K images. What took the Ryzen 3 3100 1,026 seconds to encode dropped to 200 seconds once a GPU was added in. So, the i9 with its faster speed and bvecause Lightroom is "intel optimized" (Dont kid yourself, Ligfhroom isnt optimized for anything) or the 50% more cores in a 3900x If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. Can you confirm this?• Compared to your roundup on October 16, 2019, the NEF export of the 3900X is suddenly considerably slower - by 35%! In this article, we want to see whether the increase in core count (and price) is worth it for Adobe Lightroom Classic. I found these past couple of benchmarks incredibly helpful in choosing my next CPU. I will quote from your Lightroom benchmark procedure : How does the scoring work?The scoring system used in our benchmark is based on the performance relative to a reference system with the following specifications: Intel Core i9 9900K 8 CoreNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB64GB of RAMSamsung 960 Pro 1TBWindows 10 (1903)Adobe Lighroom Classic CC 2019 (ver. Might not be much if you are lucky, or it might result in numerous random bluescreens or application crashes. Is there any chance you might add capture one to the software you benchmark in the future? I'm currently building a desktop machine for editing in Lightroom Classic based on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 12x 3.80GHz. First things first: Thank you for the lightning fast testing of the new 3950X!However, it is very difficult to draw meaningful conclusions without a closer look at your numbers:• You seem to have tested Intel with HT-on. We actually just put a post up about why we are shifting to DDR4-3200 RAM on (most) of our systems: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic and that performance will vary widely in different applications. Benchmark. We do have a couple of projects planned for 2020 that we hope will help things quite a bit for this however. Things have actually changed a bit regarding HT/SMT with Lightroom Classic V9.0 . Lightroom: cache size 500GB catalogue size 5-6gb library 6tb Settings and library is identical. Example for dragging the Noise Reduction Luminance slider, Fuji X-T1 RAW image: from almost real time to 3 seconds. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs. Interestingly the Texture slider on the K1200 is real time, no measurable delay. It’s the Mac Pro that’s *REALLY* bad. 3950x: 19 min 30 sek Here both CPUs had 100% usage for the entire exporte, but despite having twice the core counts the 3950x was slower. With that really quick look at workstation performance out-of-the-way, we can move onto a look at gaming performance – aka: the true reason for this article’s existence today. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic. A faster export is certainly welcome. If you want more information on the specs of this new processor, we recommend checking out our New CPU Announcement: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X post. Right now I’m running an Intel i7-6850 and lightroom pretty much locks up my system (100% CPU Usage) when I’m importing and creating previews or exporting. Multi displays can make it really hard to tell what the actual screen resolution is if there are different display resolutions in use, as does different DPI settings. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. Since that reference score was made, we've upgraded to Lightroom Classic 9.0 and there have been numerous BIOS, driver, and Windows updates that have come though. For a number of reasons which I won't go into here, there is a preference for Quadro cards. There is only a 5-10% improvement above the E5-1650 V4 by the latest 6-core Xeon processors. 9.2 is at least 4 times slower than the last V8 release. The thing is, Ryzen isn’t really impressive at all in terms of performance. As has been stated in the benchmarks that the video card, above a minimum level, doesn't much impact Lightroom performance (except for the Texture slider); if I upgrade from the K1200 to the RTX 4000 vs the GTX 2080 Ti, am I going to see equivalent performance with the RTX 4000? The reason I ask is because there are many reports of Lightroom not performing well if the CPU has more than 4 physical cores. You already know it better!• Looking at the NEF numbers, there is really no reason to spend even a penny more for a 3950x instead of a 3900x (for Photoshop and Lightroom only). You can still get more overall performance from the (significantly) more expensive Threadripper processors, but the Ryzen 9 5900X, in particular, is not too far behind those beefier models. Eine kleine Benchmark Orgie meines neuen Ryzen 2700er Computers. There is no need for that high-end of a GPU, but in the off chance that it does make an impact, we want to make sure that the performance is being primarily limited by the CPU rather than another component. I was wondering if you had performed any testing using this faster memory, and whether further big gains were achievable for a modest investment. 2) The system shouldn't lock up, but if it does, you can always do some trickery with Windows affinity so that Lightroom isn't allowed to use a handful of CPU cores. Putting a dual slot video card right next to the HP Z Turbo Drive would likely create heat issues as Hard Disk Sentinel says it's the hottest running drive in my machine. It be good to compare these results with SMT off. I haven't seen any benchmarks on the Ryzen CPUs, don't go by the hype, find some benchmarks. Is there a solution for the same Benchmark as Photoshop to validate both for example - new PS Action compared with new AP Macro? We might do something for other apps that use the GPU more (Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, etc), but I doubt we will invest the time to test Lightroom Classic. Since this testing was completed, Premiere Pro 14.2 released with some huge GPU performance improvements. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. This effectively puts AMD in the lead over Intel no matter what your budget is and what parts of Lightroom Classic you want to optimize for. Its a strong alternative to lightroom and it has better performance, but I can´t seem to find how it responds to different hardwareGreat article BTW :D. Capture One is on our list, but it honestly will likely be at least a year or longer before we are able to take it on - we have a few other major project to take on first. Ideally, I would love to have both, as well as if the CPU and GPU are overclocked or not. So for A7R3 42Mp .ARW files , is the 9900k better than 3900x ? For years, neither Intel nor AMD have done anything to really justify an upgrade. We are still working on updating our Lightroom testing right now, so it may be a bit before we look at the new Ryzen CPUs in Lightroom. The officially supported RAM speed varies from DDR4-2666 to DDR4-3200 depending on how many sticks you are using and whether they are dual or single rank, and DDR4-2933 is right in the middle as well as being the fastest supported speed if you want to use four sticks of RAM. "Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. Maybe once we are able to test the features that use the GPU a bit better, but for now, there is almost no chance our testing would show any difference. So we would need to be able to detect what display the app is running on which I don't believe we can do very easily. You can apply those after you're done, as a batch. Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? Soon after launch, there should be an update that adds support for AGESA 1.1.0 which is supposed to increase the performance of each Ryzen CPU by another few percent. Granted, I’m importing thousands of RAW files at a time and exporting hundreds of JPG’s (the life of a family photographer on the beach). Calibrating the monitors had no impact as expected, Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro. I actually had been considering the 9900 prior to the 3900x, but the link in my OP is to some benchmarks specifically related to Lightroom performance, and the 3900x has about a 25-30% gains over the Intel counterparts. Comparison of 2700x and 3900X stock rendering 550 still photos. In order to see how each of these configurations performs in Lightroom Classic, we will be using our PugetBench for Lightroom Classic V0.92 benchmark and Lightroom Classic version 10.0. I’ve narrowed it down to 2 top contenders, the TR 3960X and the Zen 5900X. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. so great that you did the test with the new 9.0 version! With the higher-end Ryzen models, we are looking at roughly a 14% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K with the Ryzen 7 5800X, or a 21% increase with the Ryzen 9 5900X. In this article, we will be examining the performance of the new AMD Ryzen 5600X, 5800X, 5900X, and 5950X in Lightroom Classic compared to a range of CPUs including the Intel 10th Gen, Intel X-10000 Series, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, and the previous generation AMD Ryzen 3000-series processors. The difference shouldn't be more than 40% though. Even if we do out own testing on older platforms, nothing is ever going to be as accurate as comparing the performance of the exact system you are using today to whatever the latest hardware is. If you are concerned about general Lightroom performance, the Intel Core i7 7700K is significantly faster for most tasks and only ~10% slower when exporting images. It's actually slower on the new setup, and I see many people complaining about Lightroom's bad performance on CPUs with more than four cores. 3) Adobe CLAIMS it only uses 6 cores, if that’s the case, do we expect them to start utilizing more cores in the future? Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. 9.1's biggest reduction was undo (Ctrl-Z), now with 9.2, applying the slider is as slow as undo. Er schafft den Test in 119 Sekunden und kostet gerade mal 370 Euro.. Der Intel Core i7-8700K kostet ähnlich wenig, braucht aber für den Parcours 195 Sekunden.. Ist sieht also so aus, als ob ein aktueller AMD Ryzen Prozessor eine sehr gute und preisgünstige Wahl für Lightroom ist. Thank you for such a competent and detailed reply. I would believe that scaling goes way down after 6 cores though. So if import with previews is a big concern, I would look at the scores for the Import and Smart Preview tests. From what I remember, the difference between various CPUs for 1:1 previews was pretty close to what we see with generating smart previews. In addition, both Intel and AMD have new processors coming out in the near future which may change the price to performance picture. 16gb ram and gtx1080. It's more expensive, but you get more cores, threads, and headroom in games and software. Or is it a problem with your benchmark?• NEF-Export: Intel 9960x is about the same as 3900x/3950x as expected. I see, it's difficult and very interesting. Posted by 1 year ago. Something like a RTX 2060 is probably a better choice since it will likely perform about the same in Lightroom Classic, but at a much lower cost. In the past, there were arguments for using an Intel processor for Lightroom Classic if you wanted to optimize for active tasks like scrolling through images, but with the new Ryzen 5000 Series CPUs, AMD takes a solid lead no matter the task. So, personally, I wouldn't worry too much about future socket compatibility, especially with DDR5, PCI-E Gen 5, and who knows what else that might be coming in the next several years. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. How about a comparison between the fastest affordable Quadro (the RTX4000) and the GTX 2080 TI? Quite often I have to let my computer sit there over night while it churns out previews… I don’t want to do that. I dont understand why the 9900K is not 1000. I would guess maybe in 2-3 weeks we can have a version for Windows up for download. I haven't tried exporting with SMT off, but I have turned off SMT when editing and it runs so much smoother. AMD has had a strong lead in Lightroom Classic for passive tasks like exporting, but Intel managed to maintain a small advantage for active tasks like scrolling through images and switching between modules. Hier findet man auch einen AMD, nämlich den Ryzen 7 3700K mit 8 Kernen. It also gets a bit hairy for us since we are partners with many of these companies, and very few of them seem to welcome head-to-head comparisons. Is there a planned solution in the near future for this problem? I also see bad performance in Lightroom classic where I exported from ARW to JPG 397 files (the same files with the same edit on both systems) with quality set to 80 and got these times: 7820x: 16 min 21 sek. In our testing for RAM timings for example, we only saw around a 5% max difference between RAM speeds: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . AMD hasn't added any more cores to their new line of processors, but among other things, they are touting a 19% IPC (instructions per clock) improvement. Same with the new Ryzen - as far as I know, AMD hasn't made an official announcement, so no way to know for sure. The recently launched AMD Ryzen 2nd generation processors are a significant step forward versus the first generation Ryzen and are now well worth considering. AMD’s focus has been on offering higher core count processors v their Intel rivals but the performance per core of an AMD processor is still very slightly behind that of Intel. Or does there exist a “political correctness” problem with Adobe? That reference score is completely static and won't ever change until we add tests to our benchmark that forces us to re-create it. Lightroom is hard to benchmark since the things that are easiest to test (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) I recently upgraded from an Intel i5 2500K system to a AMD Ryzen 1800X-based machine. In my case, switching between to Monitors (separately connected and separately tested on the same PC) 1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 (AMD RX570 4GB) gives me a difference of 17% in some important Tasks! It is also worth noting that the 5800X and 5900X outperformed the 10900K not only in the passive tasks but the active ones as well, which was where Intel was previously maintaining a slight edge. We've tried to work with the devs to add the functionality we need, but it can be hard to find time to add features that help us when they are busy tackling bugs and adding features that are useful for their end users. It will probably end up being a pretty big project since we are going to have to take into account how many displays are being used as well as the resolution for each display (since that apparently is a big factor for Lightroom GPU performance). Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Over the last few years, AMD has been making great strides with their Ryzen and Threadripper processors, often matching - or beating - the performance from similarly priced Intel options. PC spec, X470 Aorus latest bios. We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. 8.4)Overall Score: 1000Active Tasks Score: 100Passive Tasks Score: 100, I dont understand why if everything is normalized to 9900K, why the score for 9900K is not 1000 (100 active / 100 passive), Yeah, compare is really interesting.. It is looking like a pretty massive programming project to not only allow people to upload, but sort, search, compare, etc., but that is something we are really excited about doing. How is the performance? You are of course free to do whatever you want with your own system, but we've always taken the stance that reliability is more important than getting a bit more performance since in a production environment, system crashes and lost work costs far more money than losing a few percent performance. The average of 87.7 and 96.5 is 92.1, which x10 is 921. The "Passive Score" does a pretty good job of summarizing performance for tasks like that as well. I used to run this task, go out for lunch, return home and listen to music for a few hours before it finished. If you are interested in how these processors compare in other applications, we also have other articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, and several other applications available on our article listing page. But 9960x is suddenly much worse with smart previews in comparison to your October-Benchmark. So in general, it should be better overall to leave SMT on currently. Definitely enough to skew results, which is why our own internal testing with locked down configurations is always going to be more reliable than publicly uploaded results. That is definitely something I want to look at! And hold that thought on the upload thing - that is a project we are hoping to get to next year. Benchmark Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs Intel 10th Gen. Are the AMD Ryzen 5000-series or Intel Core 10th Gen better for Lightroom Classic? Right now our plate is pretty full, but that is pretty close to the top of my to-do list. The devs have also been putting a ton of work into improving many aspects of LrC that we haven't figured out a good way to test like brush/slider lag and things like that. The Quadro line is mostly about having high amounts of VRAM which almost never a problem for photography applications. These results are then combined into an overall score to give you a general idea of how that specific configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. 2) Should I expect my PC to continue to lock up with either of these CPU’s? :-), - There are no information about Screenresolution- There are no information about RAM CL-Timings. Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. In other reviews, however, there are indications that the 3950x could do significantly better than the 3900x with SMT-off. This limits the Ryzen platform to 64GB of RAM while the other platforms had 128GB, but since our Lightroom Classic benchmark never needs more than 32GB of RAM to run, this does not affect performance at all. That seems huge considering we only see 5-15% gains between CPU generations. Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series. From what your headaches are, the Threadripper 3960X is probably the way to go. 4-core CPUs are becoming hard to find (but not yet impossible), and I would certainly like to upgrade my computer to take advantage of the i9 or Ryzen power in all my … I think above a small GPU upgrade, you are going to be bottlenecked by your CPU. Is this due to another "performance optimization" of Adobe? One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. Even with all the improvements Adobe has done in the last couple of Lightroom versions to take advantage of the GPU, it is still primarily a CPU-driven application. Puget Systems Lightroom and Photoshop Benchmarks Before we tell photographers if AMD or Intel runs Lightroom and Photoshop better, it is important to know why it is Matt Bach from Puget Systems is so qualified to speak to the topic. Also, waiting for the LR benchmark. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the next step up from the Ryzen 5 3600X in terms of performance and price. The reason we use a 2080Ti in our CPU-based testing is simply to make sure that the GPU is not a bottleneck. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. System Specs ----- Asus Pro X370 Prime (Bios 0515) Ryzen 1700x @ … For comparison, both the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core and Intel Core i9 9900K 8 Core have a MSRP of $499. When using nvidia FPS counter my rysen system peaks to 3-4fps while my intel system goes up to 20-30fps while regulating the sliders. Comparing applications is something we don't really try to do since there is so much more to why you would use one application over another than straight performance. Thanks for the info on Lightroom's inability to use SMT. I NEVER delete anything. It may only be about 5% faster overall than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, but that still makes it solidly the fastest CPU we have ever tested for Lightroom Classic. And since the August update it finally - 10627947 Ah, got you, sorry I misunderstood! HP Z440, 6-core Xeon, 64GB ECC RAM, Quadro K1200 4GB, five SSDs (dedicated Samsung 2TB 860 EVO on the PCIe bus for the library/catalog and 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO for the Preview Cache), two 4K monitors but Lightroom full screen on just one monitor. In Photoshop is “opening a file” or “filter results” for me very important, and on and on... Lightroom is sooo good and simultaneously sooo bad :-) I love and edit my files sometimes in Capture One too, but I found Lightroom for my organisational tasks a little bit better. There is almost no reason to use the X-series when the Core i9 10900K is both less expensive and faster, so the true performance lead with the AMD Ryzen 5000-series peaks out closer to only 20%. A few notes on the hardware and software used for our testing: First, we have decided to standardize on DDR4-2933 memory for the Ryzen platform. Yet, if i take a look on the scores of the 9900k it's 921 (87.7 active + 96.5 passive). I am stoked for the release of the Ryzen 5000 chips. I also know Puget Systems recommendations for RAM frequency but in the real world there are many out there with 3600 Mhz or more, see Puget systems database results :-) My working settings are moderate CL 16-18-18-38 2933 Mhz. If you take results seriously, you must search for your workflow results in details. Now, AMD is launching one more 3rd generation Ryzen CPU - the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Organize Lightroom Catalogs. With this motherboard, Thunderbolt support is no longer as much of a factor when choosing between Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen CPUs in our workstations. Frequency can be grabbed through WMI or through the command line, but timings would need an external application which we have tried to avoid doing since it makes cross-platform support much harder. Not only it's probably more important and has bigger impact on the workflow than the export, but one usually exports less images than import and the work is already done. Both missing informations are very important for the endresult. At least today we have the option to get twice the performance for twice the money. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Big THX again for your invested time, very kind of you. Maybe in the future we will try to figure out reliable ways to check for all those things, but for now we are more concerned about making the benchmarks reliable and that they are testing everything we want. It is definitely one of the more "finicky" of our benchmarks (none of these apps are made for benchmarking, so we have to do some "creative" things to get them to work). Takt und IPC zählen. I don't think that is because any of them are scared, but rather because it is much harder to place a value on workflow optimizations than it is for things like "how long does this effect take to apply?". So my questions are: 1) given everything I’ve told you, which should I go with? To get up to the same performance as a RTX 2080 Ti, you are going to need a Quadro RTX 6000, and even then it will likely be slightly slower. All of those can affect performance, and it looks like we have overall seen a performance drop of about 8% with the 9900K since that time. Hence the attraction of a single slot card. Benchmark. When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. At the first look it seems like there can't be more than 5% but :-): RAMDual rank -> Single rank2 DIMM -> 4 DIMMDaisy Chain -> T-Topology2666 Mhz -> 3600Mhz -> 4400 MhzCL 19-19-19-19 -> CL-14-15-15AMD -> INTEL, Resolution1980 + 1020 -> 2560 x 1440 -> 3840 x 2160. Not sure there is anything meaningfully faster that will go into the current CPU socket. I notice that you perform the Lightroom benchmarks with 3200Mhz CL22 memory. (assuming that the 10700k in these results is on par with that old 9900k). For the Crowd - The overall result of active and passive tasks are indicators. Overall, the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs from AMD are terrific for Lightroom Classic. High praise & recommendation for the current generation Ryzen CPUs. As for the future, only the developers could tell you.4) No way to really know. Iknow, i know, it's a little bit malicious :-). Between a Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2080 Ti, however, you likely won't notice much of a difference. We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. We used to test 1:1 preview generation, but it wasn't something supported by the API so we had to drop it when we made the benchmark available for public download. AMD has said before that Threadripper wouldn't change socket, then they changes to TRX40 with the latest CPUs. Thanks for the read! On my system, for the Develop sliders (the only performance characteristic I care about as I spend 90+% of my Lightroom time dragging sliders), V9.1 was a slowdown and 9.2 a huge slowdown. Is the correct interpretation then that Lightroom has become ~13% slower between versions 8.4 and 10.0 in the 'active' test? One of the reasons we sometimes used the Intel 10th Gen CPUs over Ryzen when the performance was similar was because only Intel platforms had passed our qualification process for Thunderbolt. Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. If your workflow includes other software packages, you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. i understood how you calculate the total score (Active + Passive)/2*10 .. So, it is possible the work they are doing there is negatively affecting the tasks we can test, but LrC is still way better overall for the end users. Lightroom is my bottleneck- its soslow its annoying. Is anyone out there using Lightroom with i9 or Ryzen CPUs? I'm currently speccing up a new desktop build to mostly run Lightroom and Photoshop, and have read elsewhere that there are good gains in memory performance by using 3600Mhz ram with CL16 or CL18 timing. Ryzen system is approximately 2x> less responsive. In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application. Most important, however, is the performance leap in editing. With the launch of AMD's new Ryzen 5000-series processors, however, it is very likely that AMD will be able to take a very solid lead over Intel in Lightroom Classic no matter what task you are looking at. With that being said, this is going to be a new build for me, and I plan on using it for gaming + my wife will be using it for photo editing (lightroom and some basic photoshop.)

Kleines Nordseeküstenschiff Kreuzworträtsel, Hagar Und Ismael In Der Wüste, May Tischtennis Einloggen, Groß- Und Kleinschreibung Diktat, Brombeeren Ohne Stacheln, Gute Zahnärzte In Der Nähe, Something That Might Happen Or Become True Synonym,

Post a Comment